Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Armstead v. Rubio et al
as 6:2018cv00584
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Armstead
Defendant:
Marco Rubio, Fred Conley, U.S. Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Johnson v. USA
as 16-13291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) and others
Ronald Jones v. U.S. Postal Service
as 16-10286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Ambrose v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2014cv22489
Plaintiff:
Yolanda E. Ambrose
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors for the U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2013cv00516
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Sherrode Smith
Defendant:
Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors for the U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawes v. U.S. Postal Service
as 4:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Dawes
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2012cv20667
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. EEOC et al
as 2:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
EEOC, City of Montgomery Fire Dept, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. EEOC et al
as 2:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
EEOC, Richard Ebbinghouse, City of Montgomery, AL Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. City of Montgomery, AL et al
as 2:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, AL, State of AL, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
