Cases 1 - 10 of 667
Davis v. State of Florida
as 6:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Lawrence Allen Davis
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Allen
as 1:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Levon Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen Franks v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11774
Petitioner:
ALLEN FRANKS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Davenport v. Davis
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Davenport
Defendant:
Walt Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Kelli Wise, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herman, Jr., Randy v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80425
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Herman, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan Armstrong v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10603
Petitioner:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
David Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10472
Petitioner:
DAVID B. ALLEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
