Death Penalty Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Bohannon v. Raybon
as 1:2024cv00249
Petitioner: Jerry Dwayne Bohannon
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Terry Raybon and others
Plaintiff: Carey Dale Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay v. Raybon
as 4:2024cv00882
Respondent: John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Petitioner: Stephon Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Respondent: John Q. Hamm
Petitioner: Wayne Holleman Travis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Largin v. Raybon
as 7:2024cv00860
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Petitioner: James Scott Largin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Jamie Mills
Defendant: John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant: Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: David P. Wilson
Defendant: John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Raybon
as 2:2023cv01433
Petitioner: Bart Wayne Johnson
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?