Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Sharpe v. Carter et al
as 5:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Sharpe
Defendant:
Betina Carter and Clyde Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv02228
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
United States, Eric H Holder, Jr, PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. CAPE et al
as 5:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
CLYDE KENNARD JONES, DARON THOMAS, MILTON THOMAS and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM BILLY CAPE , DAVID E MORGAN, III , THERESE S BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Gadsden City PD et al
as 4:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Clyde Harris
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Gadsden City PD and Chumley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Frazier v. Clyde Knowlton, et al
as 13-13195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CLYDE KNOWLTON, ROBERT J. SEWELL and ANTHONY KATHER
Frazier v. Crawford, et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv01000
Plaintiff:
Edward Frazier
Defendant:
Thomas A. Crawford, Clyde Knowlton, Robert J. Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Clyde E Jones, Brandon K Falls, Anne Marie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suggs v. Baldwin County Mental Health Center
as 1:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Calvin Earl Suggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Baldwin County Mental Health Center, Dr. Cummins and Clyde Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dale Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prison, Dr. Cintron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Bradford v. Sheriff, et al
as 11-13326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLYDE BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF, PRITCHETT TOWING SERVICE, RANDALL SANDERS, Agent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
