Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
Marco Cadejuste v. City of Ft. Pierce, et al
as 23-13207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCO CADEJUSTE
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA, SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cadejuste v. City of Ft. Pierce et al
as 2:2023cv14274
Plaintiff:
Marco Thony Cadejuste
Defendant:
City of Ft. Pierce, County of St. Lucie, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus Rose, Jr. v. Sherwood Bauer, Jr., et al
as 22-13719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUGUSTUS ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERWOOD BAUER, JR., DAN L. VAUGHN, MICHAEL CARLTON HEISEY and others
Doherty v. St. Lucie County et al
as 2:2022cv14287
Plaintiff:
Keith Robert Doherty
Defendant:
St. Lucie County, St. Lucie County Public Defender's Office, Diamond Litty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Bauer et al
as 2:2022cv14009
Plaintiff:
Augustus Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Dan Lewis Vaughn, Michael Carlton Heisey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAMOND v. SMITH
as 5:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DIAMOND
Defendant:
ARNEIKA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAIR v. HOWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00330
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR RANDY HOWARD, INVESTIGATOR TENNELL, WARDEN AIMEE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAMOND v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00453
Defendant:
JACK SAULS, ARETHA SMITH, RODNEY JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv04764
Defendant:
Jack Sauls, Aretha Smith, Rodney Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
