Cases 111 - 120 of 34,063
DeMon v. Foster et al
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Ryan Frank DeMon
Defendant:
Unit Manager Foster, Lt. Williams, CERT Officer Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson et al v. Bernard et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Defendant:
Mr. Terry Bernard, Mrs. Lisa Scruggins and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLVILLE v. CHESTNUT et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
JACOB MONROE COLVILLE
Defendant:
T CHESTNUT and ESCAMBIA COUNTY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Flowers et al
as 6:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Idecheac A. McCoy
Defendant:
Mark Flowers, Deputy Nelson, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickles v. Judd et al
as 8:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Pickles
Defendant:
Grady Judd, FNU Wilson, Yes Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noel v. Suwannee Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Noel
Defendant:
Suwannee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Houston Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Sgt. Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAUGHAN v. PURIFOY
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W VAUGHAN
Defendant:
MIKESHIA PURIFOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Llovera v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Rafael Llovera
Defendant:
Stephen Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
