Prison Condition Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Gill v. Warden, USP Hazelton et al
as 6:2021cv00416
Defendant: United States Marshal Services, Jason A. Sickler, Health Services, USP Hazelton and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Cordero et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00139
Defendant: FCC Coleman USP-1, Hughes, D. Bolden and others
Plaintiff: Calvin James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Cordero et al
as 3:2021cv00219
Defendant: FCC Coleman USP-1, Hughes, D. Bolden and others
Plaintiff: Calvin James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2020cv00303
Plaintiff: Calvin B James and Calvin B. James
Defendant: FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Warden of USP Coleman-II et al
as 8:2020cv01194
Plaintiff: Marcus Wright
Defendant: Attorney General, United States of America and Warden of USP Coleman-II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walls v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00161
Plaintiff: Alexander J. Walls
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Coleman Florida's USP #2 and Charles L. Lockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walls v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2020cv00634
Plaintiff: Alexander J. Walls
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Coleman Florida's USP #2 and Charles L. Lockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom v. CNN et al
as 1:2019cv04206
Plaintiff: Dr. Nathan LaRon Grissom
Defendant: USP Atlanta, Viacom, Fox News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackroy v. USP Lee
as 6:2018cv01800
Plaintiff: Latavis Mackroy
Defendant: USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinkle v. FCI Ft. Dix et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff: Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant: FCI Ft. Dix, FCI Texarkana, FCI Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?