Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Underwood v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Stanley Underwood
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Chris Robertson, Officer Chasen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Lewis Hulett, Sgt. Cross and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Underwood v. Ventress Correctional Facility Health Care et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Stanley Underwood
Defendant:
Ventress Correctional Facility Health Care, J. C. Giles and Mrs. Burks
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dobbins v. Hulett et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00895
Plaintiff:
William Geoffery Dobbins
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Lewis Hulett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00876
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, John Peasant and N. Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbins v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00875
Plaintiff:
William Geoffery Dobbins
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Nettie Burton, John Peasant and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reeves v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00821
Plaintiff:
Richard Kyle Reeves
Defendant:
Warden Jones, J. C. Giles, Warden Mason and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Giles (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Marshall
Defendant:
J. C. Giles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dobbins v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2008cv00747
Plaintiff:
William Geoffery Dobbins
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Richard Allen, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00713
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Carter
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, Doctor Peasant, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
