Cases 71 - 80 of 34,550
Curry, Alexander v. Thorne
as 1:2024cv23386
Defendant:
Aubrey L. Thorne
Plaintiff:
Alexander James Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz, Francisco v. Menard et al
as 1:2024cv23395
Defendant:
Menard, Maldonado, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. U.S. Penitentiary Victorville
as 3:2024cv00905
Defendant:
U.S. Penitentiary Victorville
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dipietrae v. Demore et al
as 6:2024cv01599
Defendant:
L. Kaye, Director Joseph Demore, RN J. Laba and others
Plaintiff:
James Dipietrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Fletcher
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Taylor
Defendant:
Lauren Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Odum et al
as 5:2024cv00064
Defendant:
Waycross Hospital, Medical Administra, Unit Manager Craver and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Hayes Walters, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alverson v. Securus Technologies, LLC
as 2:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Alverson
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, LLC and Jaypay, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Defendant:
BLACKWATER RIVER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and S DAVIS
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morriss v. DIXON
as 0:2024cv61624
Plaintiff:
Robert Morriss
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Baker County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Defendant:
Randy Crews, Joshua Whitehead, Baker County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
