Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Poole, Leo V. v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80469
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole and Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
Rick Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephon Suggs v. Brian Kemp, et al
as 22-12377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHON W. SUGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN P. KEMP, Governor for the State of Georgia, individual and official capacities, TIMOTHY C. WARD, Commissioner for GA Dept. of Corrections, individual and official capacities, MR. BOBBIT, Warden for G.D.C. State Prison, individual and official capacities and others
Lee v. Governor, State of Florida et al
as 2:2022cv14254
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lee
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McConico v. Cook et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Cook, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Williams
as 3:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Caleb Z. Poole
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Tucker
as 3:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Caleb Z. Poole
Defendant:
Michael Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Intown Suites
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Caleb Z. Poole
Defendant:
Intown Suites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Tucker
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Caleb Poole
Defendant:
Michael Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConico v. Cook et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Cook, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Chaplanin
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Caleb Poole
Defendant:
Chaplanin and Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
