Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McCoy v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Randal B McCoy
Defendant:
State of Alabama, St. Clair County, Judge Phil Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. St. Clair County Sherrif's Department, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Randal B. McCoy
Defendant:
St. Clair County Sherrif's Department, Alabama, Officer Bishop, Officer Kavli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. St. Clair County (INMATE 1)
as 4:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
John Eric Jennings
Defendant:
St Clair County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. St. Clair County (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00570
Plaintiff:
John Eric Jennings
Defendant:
St. Clair County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. St. Clair County et al
as 4:2020cv01120
Defendant:
Alan Furr and St. Clair County
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States et al
as 4:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Mitchell, United States, John Kitchens and others
Plaintiff:
Charla Lynn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. St Clair County et al
as 4:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Booker
Defendant:
St Clair County, Peoples and Palmer
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridier v. St Clair County Jail
as 4:2015cv01622
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bridier
Defendant:
St Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langford v. St. Clair County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2010cv01527
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Errol Langford, Jr
Defendant:
St. Clair County Sheriff Department, Moss and Marcrum
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallup v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2010cv00756
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCallup
Defendant:
Mitchell, St Clair County, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
