Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Corral v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv00972
Plaintiff:
Devon Corral
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Patillo v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
Devon D. Patillo
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Burruss v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ashley Devon Burruss
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Snipe v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Quentavius Devon Snipe
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stewart v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv22755
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Devon Stewart
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Mantz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00545
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Devon Brooks Mantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Riles v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv03851
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Devon Riles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walraven v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00202
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Zeakieal Devon Walraven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv02618
Plaintiff:
Dushun Devon Raymond Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Billingsley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv01699
Plaintiff:
Calvin Devone Billingsley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
