Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Mid-Atlantic Bulk Carriers LTD v. Z-Dust Group Inc
as 2:2019cv01296
Defendant:
Z-Dust Group Inc
Plaintiff:
Mid-Atlantic Bulk Carriers LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malachi York v. Macon County Police Department, et al
as 19-12710
Defendant / Appellee:
BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALACHI Z. YORK
Government Employees Insurance Co, et al v. Mas et al
as 1:2019cv21183
Defendant:
Leonel Diaz-Pairol, Daimy N. Diaz, Rafael Norberto Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Co., Government Employees Insurance Co,, Geico Casualty Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gross v. Energen Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01711
Defendant:
William G Hargett, Energen Corporation, Alan Kleier and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gross
Stein v. Energen Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01746
Defendant:
William G Hargett, Energen Corporation, Vincent J Intrieri and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Lavish Bistro, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03903
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ludovic Kenmegne, Lavish Bistro, Inc. and Alexis Z. Anin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Alter Ego'z Sports Bar & Grill Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Alter Ego'z Sports Bar & Grill Inc. and Keion S. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 47 USC 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
