Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Larry Duke v. USA
as 13-11393
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY RONALD DUKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv62356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Dwight Duke
as 12-14543
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DWIGHT DUKES, a.k.a. "D"
Dealer Services Corporation v. Duke
as 1:2012mc00004
Plaintiff:
Dealer Services Corporation
Defendant:
Timothy W. Duke
Duke et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C.
as 2:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Kent Duke and Jacqueline C Duke
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DC Equipment, Inc. v. GPS Consulting LLC et al
as 4:2011mc00052
Plaintiff:
DC Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
GPS Consulting LLC, JBB LLC, Buddy Miller and others
Duke v. State of Florida
as 0:2011cv62125
Plaintiff:
Donald Austin Duke
Defendant:
State of Florida, 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, Robert F. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Stephen Dunlap
as 11-12541
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN DUNLAP, a.k.a. Superintendent Duke
Duke et al v. Cox Enterprises Inc
as 5:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Patti Duke, Patti Duke, Bobby Bowick and others
Defendant:
Cox Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reynolds v. Dept/Transportation, et al
as 2:1985cv00665
Plaintiff:
Johnny Reynolds
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Cecil Parker , Robert Johnson , Frank Reed and others
Defendant:
Department of Transportation, State of Alabama , Department of Personnel, State of Alabama , Thomas G. Flowers and others
Pecial_master:
Laurie Edelstein and Carlos Gonzalez
Amicu:
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Movant:
Robert Camp, John Robbins, Lieutenant Dukes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
