Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Tong v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01015
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
Nam Ngoc Tong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in
MINGUES et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01933
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
NAM PHAM and SHARON K. MINGUES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACK et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02059
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANE VAUGHN, CAMERON SHIELDS, ARSENIO PELAYO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kim v. Carnival Corp.
as 1:2018cv21510
Plaintiff:
Sun Nam Kim
Defendant:
Carnival Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yong Wilson, et al v. Matthew Miller, et al
as 15-14570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YONG NAM WILSON, as Administrator of the Estate of Lemuel Keith Wilson, JESSICA BATES, as natural guardian and next friend of T.S. Wilson and LATRICE WILLIAMS, as natural guardian and next friend of M. Wilson
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW MILLER, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer of the City of Pelham, NEALIE MCCORMICK, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Pelham and CITY OF PELHAM, a municipal corporation of Georgia
Knight v. Shin
as 2:2015cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Knight
Defendant:
Nam Sun Shin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
YONG NAM WILSON , JESSICA BATES and LATRICE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MATTHEW MILLER , Nealie McCormick and CITY OF PELHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nam et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03924
Plaintiff:
William Nam and Jin Nam
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. , U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc , U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
