Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 260
Young Americans for Freedom of Kennesaw State University et al v. Harmon et al
as 1:2018cv00956
Plaintiff: Young Americans for Freedom of Kennesaw State University and Zachary Bohannon
Defendant: W. Ken Harmon , Andrew Newton , Kathleen C. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-10586
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00027
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Defendant: City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00012
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Defendant: City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. The State of Alabama (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00868
Plaintiff: Rodney Murphy
Defendant: The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adderley v. Ego et al
as 0:2017cv62410
Plaintiff: Michael Adderley
Defendant: Gloria Ego, Michael Ahearn, Edmund Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROWN v. MURPHY AUTO GROUP OF ALBANY INC
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BROWN
Defendant: MURPHY AUTO GROUP OF ALBANY INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KING v. MURPHY AUTO GROUP OF ALBANY
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff: KAWAJALEIN KING
Defendant: MURPHY AUTO GROUP OF ALBANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?