Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff A, et al v. Richard Schair, et al
as 14-14452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PLAINTIFF A, PLAINTIFF B, PLAINTIFF C and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD WAYNE SCHAIR and WET-A-LINE TOURS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-13654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ra Shipps v. State of Florida, et al
as 14-12882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RA P. SHIPPS, and Plaintiffs to be Named
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, 62 PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, DIVISION 62 PROSECUTORS, to be named and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Clifton Bell v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Tra, et al
as 14-10864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MARTA), WANDA DUNHAM, JOSEPH DORSEY, ASSISTANT CHIEF and others
Plaintiff A, et al v. Richard Schair, et al
as 12-16542
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PLAINTIFF A, PLAINTIFF B, PLAINTIFF C and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD WAYNE SCHAIR and WET-A-LINE TOURS, LLC
Clifton Bell v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Tra, et al
as 12-15371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MARTA), WANDA DUNHAM, Personally, JOSEPH DORSEY, Personally and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff A et al v. Schair et al
as 2:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff A , Plaintiff B , Plaintiff C and others
Defendant:
Richard Wayne Schair and Wet-A-Line Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority et al
as 1:2010cv01117
Plaintiff:
Clifton Bell
Defendant:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Wanda Dunham, Joseph Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.