Cases 11 - 20 of 4,681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CLAYTON v. CONE et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, DEBRA SANDERS, Dr WYNN and others
Plaintiff:
JACK CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Alabama Alcohol Control Board et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Defendant:
Eric Jensen, Charles Price, Vernon Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philipps v. Thomas Concrete of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert Philipps
Defendant:
William L. Kidd and Thomas Concrete of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Mobile Police Department
as 1:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judah v. City of Dothan et al
as 2:2024cv00552
Defendant:
Hunter Sanders, Casey Beck, William E Benny and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie D. Judah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
