Cases 11 - 20 of 1,465
Hesser v. Becraft Jr.
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Peter Hesser
Defendant:
Lowel H. Becraft Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Daniel Craig, et al
as 24-11610
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
DANIEL J. CRAIG, In his Official and Individual Capacities, MATHEW ROBINS, In his Official and Individual Capacities, ASHA JACKSON, In her Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant:
Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deandre Arnold v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 24-10835
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, CHRIS CARR, REGINALD SCANDRETT and others
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN, Larry L. Thomas Jr and LARRY L THOMAS JR
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Wade v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Barton Wade
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Officer H. Crouch and Officer M. Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuyler v. Wilson et al
as 8:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
James M. Cuyler
Defendant:
Charles R. Wilson, William H. Pryor, Jr., Adalberto Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
