Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 U.S. Services Employment/Reemployment Act of 1994
Roberts v. Pontes et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Nathan Leon Roberts
Defendant:
Joe Pontes, W. Green, Amy S. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Munzel v. Hillsborough County et al
as 8:2021cv02185
Plaintiff:
Clyde W. Munzel
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Carmine Pisano and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLYDE ARMORY INC, et al v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Blaine Williams, Judd Drake, Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Armory, Inc., FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC OF ATHENS INC, CLYDE ARMORY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Wilkie et al (MAG+)
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Sharon Hicks, Clyde W. Marsh, Robert Wilkie and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00385
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. GEICO et al
as 3:2018cv01300
Respondent:
KATIE ROSS, GEICO and DAREK CLYDE ADAMS ESTATE
Petitioner:
JOHN W HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale
as 2:2018cv01749
Defendant:
Dan Smith, Omar, Mike Hale and others
Plaintiff:
D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
