Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jeffrey Fisher v. SP One, Ltd., et al
as 13-11307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
SP ONE, LTD., TOM ROBINSON, in his capacity as site manager, ROYAL AMERICAN MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Van Dyke v. Needleman et al
as 6:2012cv01918
Plaintiff:
Ron Van Dyke
Defendant:
Mitch Needleman, J. Preston Silvernail , John M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Cowart et al
as 2:2012cv14378
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Green
Defendant:
Betty Cowart , Colonel R. Dykes , L.T. Striebel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Jane Haggerty, et al
as 12-12541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE S. HAGGERTY, Individual and Offical Capacities, GERALDINE S. HINES, Individual and Official Capacities, JAMES H. VAN DYKE, Attorney, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Azubuko et al v. Haggerty et al
as 1:2011cv23332
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E Azubuko and Precious Okereke
Defendant:
Jane S Haggerty, Geraldine S Hines, James H Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fisher v. SP One, Ltd et al
as 8:2011cv01889
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fisher
Defendant:
SP One, Ltd , Tom Robinson , Royal American Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Walden Landing v. Dykes
as 1:2011cv02378
Plaintiff:
Walden Landing
Defendant:
Gregory Leroy Dykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Cypress Village, LTD. et al
as 3:2010cv00994
Plaintiff:
Charisse D. Allen
Defendant:
Cypress Village, LTD., The Bennett Group, Fred Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv21120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
