Cases 11 - 20 of 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Deandre Arnold v. City of Hampton, et al
as 23-11965
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HAMPTON, WAYNE JERNIGAN, OTANYA CLARKE and others
Latoya Glenn v. Shane Britt, et al
as 23-11890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATOYA GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANE BRITT and DERRICK PATRICK BARTLETT
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Abernathy v. Dawson et al
as 1:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
Dasha Abernathy
Defendant:
Officer Devon Dawson, Officer White, Officer Derrick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cohen et al v. Childs et al
as 1:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cohen
Defendant:
Kimberly Childs, Office of the Cobb County District Attorneys' Office and Cobb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROOMS v. LOFTON et al
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
JEREMY CROOMS
Defendant:
DEPUTY DERRICK LOFTON, KELVIN HARRIS and DERRICK LOFTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Derrick Walker v. Progressive Select Insurance Company
as 22-14072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK L. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
