Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MaGee v. Barbagelata et al
as 1:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Arlene Turner MaGee
Defendant:
Daniel K. Barbagelata , McCurdy & Candler, LLC and National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flowers et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al(MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00832
Plaintiff:
Melvin J. Flowers and The Circle F Ranch, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, David McCurdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCurdy v. Miguel et al
as 1:2009cv01989
Plaintiff:
Jahsaiah McCurdy
Defendant:
William A. Miguel, Michael B. Porter, Terry M. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
McCurdy et al v. Harper et al
as 1:2008cv02145
Plaintiff:
W. Phillip McCurdy, III, W. Phillip McCurdy, III, Michael Shane Cawthon and others
Defendant:
Mark N. Harper, A. L. Thompson, Doris L. Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCurdy et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2007cv03098
Plaintiff:
W. Phillip McCurdy, III, Michael Shane Cawthon and Nelson W. Picklesimer
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Mark N. Harper, Stefani R. Searcy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FLEMING et al v. BARBER et al
as 3:2007cv00279
Plaintiff:
RONALD D FLEMING and ROBBYE J FLEMING
Defendant:
TAMA BARBER, ROBERT WELLER, JERRY GOOLSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.