Cases 11 - 20 of 125
William Pearson v. Citibank, et al
as 22-12198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM OCIE PEARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIBANK and EXECUTIVE RESPONSE UNIT-CITI, Financial Banking Institution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10292
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pearson v. Citibank Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04899
Plaintiff:
William Ocie Pearson
Defendant:
Citibank Corporation and Executive Response Unit -Citi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ozubko v. Denninger et al
as 1:2021cv04477
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ozubko
Defendant:
Officer Trent Denninger, Officer Christian Pearson and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindberg v. Lemonidis et al
as 6:2021cv01783
Plaintiff:
Lena Marie Lindberg
Defendant:
Robin C. Lemonidis, Lori Todd, F. Barberi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Mobley et al
as 3:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Terri Pearson
Defendant:
Justin Mobley, Janet Moon, City of Peachtree City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Target Stores Inc
as 2:2020cv02017
Plaintiff:
Angela Pearson
Defendant:
Target Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coley-Pearson v. Martin et al
as 5:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Emily Misty Martin, Joe Stewart, The City of Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Coley-Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2020cv04809
Defendant:
Anh Le, Matthew Mashburn, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Jay Van Gundy, Coreco Jaqan Pearson, Cathleen Alston Latham and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DCCC, DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc.
Intervenor:
Alice O'Lenick, Stephen Day, Ben Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Gracepoint et al
as 8:2020cv01434
Defendant:
Gracepoint, Hillsborough County Sheriff and Tampa Police Department
Plaintiff:
Vernon J. Pearson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
