Cases 31 - 40 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Pierce et al v. Hate Crime Victim Jane/John Doe
as 4:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
David Pierce, Sherrie Pierce, Breanna Pierce and others
Defendant:
Hate Crime Victim Jane/John Doe and Ava Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 6:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
Pierce Robertson
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, State of Florida, One Hope United and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Baxter et al v. Santiago-Miranda et al
as 6:2021cv00718
Plaintiff:
Al-Quan Pierce and Veronica Baxter
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Ivey, Jefet Santiago-Miranda, Carson Hendren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barberi v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 0:2021cv60649
Defendant:
PIERCE HARDY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and 84 LUMBER COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Yealy et al v. Mount Pisgah Christian School et al
as 1:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Pam Yealy, Leyton Yealy and David Yealy
Defendant:
James Lee, Ruston Pierce, Mary Ann Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv60434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
