Cases 31 - 40 of 5,067
Berger v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, FEB Bancshares, Inc., 22nd State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Parham v. City of St. Augustine et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
James Parham
Defendant:
City of St. Augustine, St. Augustine Police Department, John Regan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Aubrey v. Fry et al
as 0:2024cv60701
Plaintiff:
Steven Benton Aubrey
Defendant:
John D Fry, Brian D Fillingim and Glen A Fitzmartin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Petro v. Bohannon et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kristen Justice Petro
Defendant:
Justin Bohannon, John Doe Holbrooks and Image Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
