Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shellielle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Kemuel Kimbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyttle v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Lyttle
Defendant:
The United States of America , ERIC HOLDER , JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Respondent:
Tracy Moten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00928
Plaintiff:
Kelda K. Randolph
Defendant:
Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reich v. United States of America et al
as 9:2011cv80178
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reich
Defendant:
United States of America, Preet Bharara, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3582
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv20348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reyes et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv03281
Plaintiff:
Kevin Herrera, Rosa Elsy Ruiz, Jimmy Herrera and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., United States of America, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-11058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
