Cases 41 - 50 of 1,260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jackson v. City of River Dale et al
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Kimyuna Jackson
Defendant:
City of River Dale, Chief Pattersoon, Investigator Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
England et al v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05443
Plaintiff:
Lateral England, Crysten Jackson and Niyah Thurmond
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC, Millenia Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BROWN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
TERRY BROWN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THOMAS BUNTON, EMILY BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
De La Rosa v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv24498
Plaintiff:
Mickel De La Rosa
Defendant:
State of Florida, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Jackson Memorial Hospital "TRUSTS" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
