Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-11058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nalls v. Coleman Low Federal Institution et al
as 5:2009cv00384
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Nalls
Respondent:
Coleman Low Federal Institution, Bureau Of Prisons and unknown parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MOORE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 3:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Saltaris v. United States of America, ex rel. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Saltaris
Defendant:
United States of America, ex rel. Bureau of Prisons and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv21795
Plaintiff:
Todd Carlton Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and State Correctional Facilities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nalls v. Coleman Low Federal Institution et al
as 1:2008cv20009
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Nalls
Defendant:
Coleman Low Federal Institution and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Dennis v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv02429
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dennis
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
