Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Jones et al v. Cape et al
as 1:2013cv03077
Plaintiff:
Clyde Kennard Jones, Daron Thomas, Milton Thomas and others
Defendant:
William Billy Cape, David E. Morgan, III, Therese S. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Robinson et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 2:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Scelia Robinson and Zack Lyde
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Amity House, Jeffrey Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Reese et al
as 1:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Darryl Carter
Defendant:
Clyde Reese, III and Keith Horton
Richard Althouse v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Of
as 13-10822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CLYDE ALTHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Burke v. City of Prattville, Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv01017
Plaintiff:
Ken Burke
Defendant:
City of Prattville, Alabama, Bill Gillespie, Terry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARTHUR v STATE OF FLORIDA, et al
as 1:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ARTHUR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ALACHUA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worthy v. Deal et al
as 2:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Worthy
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Clyde L. Reese, III, Keith Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony et al v. Coffee County et al
as 5:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Clyde Anthony and April Fletcher
Defendant:
Coffee County , Tom Rice , Jimmy Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde Harvick v. Clarence Carter, et al
as 12-11931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE RAY HARVICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARENCE H. CARTER, Director, Department of Economic Security, State of Arizona, SCOTT TRADE, INC. and SUSAN SHAUF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
