Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Bradshaw v. Adair et al
as 1:2017cv02621
Plaintiff:
Sigfrid Nicholas Bradshaw
Defendant:
Alex Adair and Valdosta Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Holmes et al
as 1:2017cv00799
Plaintiff:
Thresa Lynn Williams
Defendant:
Doris Holmes, Alabama Mental Health Dept., Talladega City Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Walker et al v. Foster et al
as 1:2017cv00545
Plaintiff:
Chandon Rashad Walker, Jameka LaShea Walker, R. M. and others
Defendant:
Nakeshia Foster, Richard Pounds, Kenneth Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Schmidt v. Daynna Tyler, et al
as 17-10662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
DAYNNA TYLER, KRISTA NAVARRO, JAMES WINTERS, Conditional Release Officer and others
Capehart v. City of Dalton et al
as 4:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
Randy Capehart
Defendant:
City of Dalton and Dalton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DeVaughn v. Sheffield Police Dept et al
as 3:2016cv01914
Plaintiff:
Sebastain Blu DeVaughn
Defendant:
Sheffield Police Dept, Garrison, Investigator of Sheffield Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer v. City of Winter Haven et al
as 8:2016cv03067
Plaintiff:
Darrell Archer
Defendant:
City of Winter Haven, Winter Haven Police Dept., Walmart Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. The City of Huntsville, Al. et al
as 5:2016cv01523
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Sharp
Defendant:
The City of Huntsville, Al., Huntsville Police Dept., R. H. Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
