Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Bostic et al v. County of Douglas et al
as 1:2011cv03585
Plaintiff:
Santerria Bostic , Scott Bostic , Willcinja Rushing and others
Defendant:
County of Douglas , Douglas County Sheriff's Office , Phil Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Sheriff of Broward County
as 0:2011cv61866
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Rush
Defendant:
Sheriff of Broward County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacqueline Finn v. Bobby Haddock, et al
as 11-12959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE FINN, Estate of James Peter Rush, as personal representative
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY HADDOCK, as Sheriff of Washington County and individually,, JONATHAN RACKARD and FRANK STONE, individually
Rushing v. Darby et al
as 8:2011cv00685
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Laila Darby and Herbert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Daker et al v. Steube et al
as 8:2010cv01784
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Daker and Barbara S. Daker
Defendant:
Brad Steube, Manatee County Sheriff's Office, Jason Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Charles Rush v. Gerald Richman, et al
as 10-12697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES L. RUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD F. RICHMAN, GARY S. BETENSKY, MANUEL A. GARCIA-LINARES and others
Rush v. Richman et al
as 0:2010cv60001
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Rush
Defendant:
Gerald F. Richman, Gary S. Betensky, Richman Greer, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foreman v. Rush et al
as 6:2009cv01041
Plaintiff:
Douglas K. Foreman, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert J. Rush, Kelly J. Fishpaugh, Craig A. Capri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
