Cases 51 - 60 of 2,493
Jones et al v. Flora et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Clyde Kennard Jones
Defendant:
Amanda Flora, April Blackburn, Gregory Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hames v. Richmond County Marshals Office et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Rasheeda E. Hames
Defendant:
Richmond County Marshals Office, Officer Brantley, Officer Billman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clement et al v. CSC of Cobb County Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo E. Clement and Ken Morton
Defendant:
CSC of Cobb County Inc., Hood Clayton Logistics LLC and The Kroger Co.
Stinson v. Fowlkes et al
as 1:2023cv24751
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russoniello v. Ingram et al
as 6:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Russoniello
Defendant:
Kelly Mccormack Ingram, Kenneth M. Clayton, Neil McCulloh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Judge Alvis et al
as 2:2023cv01638
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Adams, Jr
Defendant:
Judge Alvis and Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
