Cases 61 - 70 of 583
Thomas v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Stavenious Thomas
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Erik Broten, Brandon Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Newkirk v. Fishback et al
as 3:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Carla Newkirk
Defendant:
Robert Fishback, John Guy, Rhasha Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEPHZIBAH v. PHILLIPS et al
as 4:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
SYTERIA HEPHZIBAH
Defendant:
JOHN PHILLIPS, ELIZABETH WARREN, TRACI E ABRAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newkirk v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Carla Newkirk
Defendant:
State of Florida, County of Duval, City of Jacksonville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Harper v. AWOL, LLC
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jessica Harper
Defendant:
AWOL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act-Public Accommodations Private
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
