Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 824
Martin v. Demesey et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff: Thelma Ivy Martin
Defendant: Jed Demesey, Amy Thomas and Rachel Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11973
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. Hise et al
as 2:2023cv00089
Plaintiff: Thelma Ivy Martin
Defendant: Tricia Hise, Amy Thomas, Allen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00611
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
PAWS JJBCR, LLC d/b/a The Noble Paw v. Martin County
as 2:2023cv14123
Plaintiff: PAWS JJBCR, LLC d/b/a The Noble Paw
Defendant: Martin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
v. Paws JJBCR, LLC d/ba The Noble Paw et al
as 2:2023cv14124
Defendant: Paws JJBCR, LLC d/ba The Noble Paw and Martin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAWS JJBCR, LLC v. Martin County
as 2:2023cv14125
Plaintiff: PAWS JJBCR, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Corporation doing business as THE NOBLE PAW and Delray Petlife, LLC
Defendant: Martin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01983
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?