Cases 71 - 80 of 697
King v. Dieppa
as 0:2022cv62073
Plaintiff:
Samantha King
Defendant:
Leticia Dieppa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Crayton v. Opa Locka Police Department
as 1:2022cv23110
Plaintiff:
King Miguel Eddie Crayton
Defendant:
Opa Locka Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wagner v. Inmobiliaria Property Holdings Corp. et al
as 6:2022cv02018
Defendant:
Jacobus Energy, Inc. formerly known as Quick Fuel LLC doing business as Chevron Stop N Go, Inmobiliaria Property Holdings Corp., Quick Fuel LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Bailey et al v. Lowndes County Commission et al
as 2:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Keith Bailey and Shenika Bailey
Defendant:
Lowndes County Commission, Joey Barganier, Charlie King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rivera v. Arlington County Department Of Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Rivera
Defendant:
Arlington County Department Of Human Services, Sean Schmergel, CASA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
