Cases 1 - 10 of 2,222
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
Oliveira v. Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Oliveira
Defendant:
Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc. and Jane Doe
STROUD v. PARRELL et al
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY STROUD
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARRELL, JOHN DOES, CAPTAIN TRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alsobrook v. City of Marietta et al
as 1:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alsobrook
Defendant:
City of Marietta, David Beam, Bill Bruton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Paul Walde v. Sharon Keri, et al
as 24-11631
Plaintiff:
PAUL DONOVAN WALDE
Defendant:
SHARON KERI, Process Manager, JOHN DOE, UNNAMED DEFENDANT PERSON OF DMV OVER SEE LICENSE SUSPENSION and UNKNOWN PERSON
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 24-11670
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant:
JUDGE ORINDA D. EVANS, JUDGE WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., JUDGE JULIE E. CARNES and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
