Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Day v. Gillis
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robyn Day
Defendant:
Keith Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Morgan v. Gentry et al
as 5:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Alex Gentry, Austin Patton, Karen Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jerome of the Family Gillis v. Coffin et al
as 0:2022cv62293
Plaintiff:
Jerome of the Family Gillis
Defendant:
Ann Coffin, Brenda D. Foreman, Mathew Tanenbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacy Terry v. Matthew Robinett, et al
as 22-13004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY TERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW W. ROBINETT, Counsel, in his official and personal capacity, J.R. GAINES, Judge, in his official and personal capacity, AMANDA BESHEAR COOK, Counsel, in her official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Terry v. Robinett et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv01058
Defendant:
J. R. Gaines, Gregory Oswald Griffin, Sr., Tiffany B. McCord and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
