Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Malcolm Neely v. Elmore County, et al
as 24-11112
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM NEELY
Defendant:
ELMORE COUNTY, ELMORE COUNTY COMMISSION, HENRY HINES, individually and in his Official Capacity as a member of the Elmore County Commission and others
Edmondson v. Vaugh et al
as 8:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Charles Edmondson
Defendant:
Cody Vaugh, Kenneth Fender, Timothy Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Neely v. Elmore County et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Neely
Defendant:
Elmore County, Elmore County Commission, Henry Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daugherty v. State Court of Forsyth County et al
as 1:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Leslie Daugherty
Defendant:
State Court of Forsyth County and T. Russell McClelland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bey v. County of Columbia Third Judicial Circuit in and for the State of Florida (Dependency Court), et al.
as 3:2019cv01260
Plaintiff:
Chad Poppell, Yolanda Chaney, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
County of Columbia Third Judicial Circuit in and for the State of Florida (Dependency Court)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03643
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
