Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Tedie Barrow, et al v. Flowers Hospital Administration, et al
as 23-12312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEDIE ROCHELLE BARROW, APRIL LATASHA THOMAS and JAWON WYKEEN TY'QUAN THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
FLOWERS HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION, HEIN N. DAO and PHILIP T. WILSON
Barrow et al v. Flowers Hospital Administration et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Tedie Rochelle Barrow, April Latasha Thomas and Jawon Wykeen Ty'Quan Thomas
Defendant:
Flowers Hospital Administration, Hein N. Dao and Philip T. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metz v. Matos et al
as 2:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Mandy Heins and FNU Matos
Plaintiff:
George D Metz, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler v. Milestone Mangagement et al
as 1:2017cv03992
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
Milestone Mangagement, Kelly Jackson, Rivervista LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Moore v. Camden Property Trust et al
as 1:2017cv01655
Defendant:
Camden Property Trust , Camden Vantage, LLC and Fowler, Hein, Cheatwood & Williams, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Krystal Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Adame-Rodriguez v. Butler et al
as 3:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Miguel Andrew Adame-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Virginia Butler , John Woodrum , Joshua Hein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv62935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephens v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv04579
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Defendant:
State of Georgia, State Bar of Georgia , State Bar of Georgia Office of General Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Hein v. Kemuel Kimbrough, Sr., et al
as 13-12362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC HEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
KEMUEL A. KIMBROUGH, SR., V. T. ROBINSON-WILLIAMS, J. SPAIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
