Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Davis v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv01279
Plaintiff: James Davis
Defendant: Gordon Smith, Michael Garmon and Paul Silverman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON et al v. BRETCHEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00411
Plaintiff: DEBRA JOYCE WILSON and KENNETH ERWIN KNOWLES
Defendant: HARRY BRETCHEL, LAURENS C LEE, WILLIAM JAMES DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. Wilson et al
as 9:2021cv80951
Defendant: James Davis, Tammy Wilson, Elaine Lancaster and others
Plaintiff: Paula Phillipson Buckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00775
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00152
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Koger v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2018cv00053
Plaintiff: Phillip Wayne Koger
Defendant: Hamilton County, Tennessee, Jim Hammond, Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menter et al v. Mahon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01029
Plaintiff: Joseph Menter , Jonathan Daniels and James Davis
Defendant: Mark H. Mahon and Mike Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly Fuqua, et al v. Donnie Haralson
as 13-10991
Plaintiff - Appellee: BEVERLY FUQUA, JOYCE SCALES, VIRGINIA STILLWELL GOODMAN and others
Defendant - Appellant: DONNIE HARALSON
: SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02811
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?