Cases 1 - 10 of 53
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv21192
Plaintiff:
Sobers Brooks
Defendant:
Renita Henry, Emily Phillips, Deborah Nabat Frankel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2023cv20185
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Wade
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Sea Lock Brody and Jimmy Sotto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BROWN v. COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT et al
as 4:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN
Defendant:
COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, ROBERT HOOKS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wendell Locke v. Charles Canady, et al
as 22-13971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL TERRY LOCKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES CANADY, RICKY POLSTON, JORGE LABARGA and others
Not Classified By Court:
ERWIN ROSENBERG
BROWN v. HOOKS, et al.
as 4:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN
Defendant:
Officer ROBERT HOOKS, Officer KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, Officer AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCKE v. CANADY et al
as 4:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wendell Locke and WENDELL TERRY LOCKE
Defendant:
CHARLES CANADY, RICKY POLSTON, JORGE LABARGA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
