Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KING v. CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA ALBANY UTILITIES et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY GEORGIA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA ALBANY FIRE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA ALBANY UTILITIES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK KING, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Stewart et al v. Patrick et al
as 1:2011cv01108
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Stewart and Joshua Allen Lanier
Defendant:
Michael Patrick and City of Samson, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Patrick et al
as 1:2011cv01099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Flowers
Defendant:
Michael Patrick and Town of Newton, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracewell v. Patrick et al
as 1:2010cv00992
Plaintiff:
Emma J. Bracewell
Defendant:
Michael Patrick, The Samson Police Department and The City of Samson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bash et al v. Patrick et al
as 2:2008cv00240
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bash, Andrew Bash, Joyce Bash and others
Defendant:
Michael Patrick, Darryl Taunton and City of Mosses, Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aiello v. Woodside et al
as 4:2007cv80472
Plaintiff:
Joel Aiello
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Woodside and Town of Jupiter, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aiello v. Woodside et al
as 9:2007cv80472
Plaintiff:
Joel Aiello
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Woodside and Town of Jupiter, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Patrick et al
as 2:2007cv00325
Plaintiff:
Cedric Bennett and Cedric Bennett
Defendant:
Michael Patrick, Michael Patrick, Michael Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
