Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, Rubin Lublin, LLC, Kimberly A. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcus Caster, et al v. Secretary of State for the State of Alabama
as 23-12923
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARCUS CASTER, LAKEISHA CHESTNUT, BOBBY LEE DEBOUSE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Marcus Caster, et al v. Secretary of State for the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-10272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARCUS CASTER, LAKEISHA CHESTNUT, BOBBY LEE DEBOUSE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, JIM MCCLENDON and CHRIS PRINGLE
Caster et al v. Merrill
as 2:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Marcus Caster, Lakeisha Chestnut, Bobby Lee DeBouse and others
Defendant:
John H Merrill, Jim McClendon and Chris Pringle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Caster et al v. Merrill
as 2:2021cv00751
Plaintiff:
Marcus Caster, LaKeisha Chestnut, Bobby Lee DeBouse and others
Defendant:
John H. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
