Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gregory et al v. Trussville, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory, Amy Gregory and Gavin Gregory
Defendant:
Trussville, Alabama, City of, Eric Rush, James McCool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin et al v. Williamson et al
as 3:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martin, Sr, Jennifer Vandiver, K. M. and others
Defendant:
Frank Williamson, Bryce Graham, Jr, Angela Hulsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prosser et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Prosser, Brooke Prosser, Fred Rush and others
Defendant:
B. T. Roberts, Clark Sahlie, James W. Rane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Colbert County, Alabama et al
as 3:2018cv01296
Defendant:
Cletus "Tom" Watson, Donald Kern, Frank Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Rushing Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rush v. Southland Tube, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01445
Plaintiff:
David Rush
Defendant:
Southland Tube, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
