Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Seay v. James et al
as 1:2023cv05232
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
Lisa James and Antresa Lumpkin-Knighten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seay v. Stinson
as 1:2023cv02979
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
Ashley Stinson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
South v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Kari Pearce, Christopher Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Seay v. The United States et al
as 1:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
The United States, State of Georgia and Ashley Stinson
Seay v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv04922
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Andrea David Vega and Judge Robert V. Rodatus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Seay v. Family Ties Inc.
as 1:2022cv04921
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
Family Ties Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Seay et al v. Stinson
as 1:2022cv04114
Petitioner:
Tamika Seay and Melvin Seay
Respondent:
Ashley Stinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Seay et al v. Department of Human Services, Division of Family and Children Services
as 1:2022cv04115
Petitioner:
Tamika Seay and Melvin Seay
Respondent:
Department of Human Services, Division of Family and Children Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
