Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01755
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00574
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DOUGLAS v. HODGSON et al
as 5:2020cv00359
Defendant: CURTIS HODGSON, JOHN NELSON, MARY SANEZ and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK D DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02090
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00910
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McMillin v. Aronberg et al
as 9:2015cv80689
Plaintiff: Barbara McMillin
Defendant: David Aronberg, Pam Bondi, Edward L Artau and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
SEARCY etal v FLORIDA BAR etal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00664
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN D SEARCY , EARL DENNEY, JR , JOHN SCAROLA and others
Defendant: THE FLORIDA BAR, JOHN F HARKNESS, ELIZABETH TARBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv60213
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013mc00080
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-12637
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?