Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Michael Deshaun Williams v. Frederick Carver, et al
as 22-13012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESHAUN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDERICK CARVER, In his individual and official capacities, TRANE TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LLC, In its individual and official capacities and INGERSOLL RAND INC/PLC, In its individual and official capacities
Michael Williams v. Vidalia Orthopedic Center LLC, et al
as 22-13014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESHAUN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
VIDALIA ORTHOPEDIC CENTER LLC, GREGORY M. WIGGINS, WIGGINS FOOT AND ANKLE ASSOCIATES, P.C. and others
Williams v. Carver et al
as 6:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael Deshaun Williams
Defendant:
Frederick Carver, Trane Technologies Company LLC and Ingersoll Rand Inc/PLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Vidalia Orthopedic Center LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Deshaun Williams
Defendant:
Vidalia Orthopedic Center LLC, Dr. Gregory M. Wiggins, Wiggins Foot and Ankle Associates P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Bevil v. The City of Huntsville et al
as 5:2008cv01846
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Bevil
Defendant:
The City of Huntsville, Loretta Spencer, Thomas G. Taylor, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
