Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Betty Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEWART v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN STEWART
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mark Stinson v. John Yates, et al
as 23-14178
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. YATES, Warden, BLAIR, Camp Unit Manager, RANDLE, Lt. and others
John Canning v. Trevonza Bobbitt, et al
as 23-13992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNING
Defendant / Appellee:
TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOSH WICKER, DEIDRA EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Mulder v. Girling et al (MAG +)
as 2:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Julius Littleton Mulder
Defendant:
Dr. Girling, The County of Elmore, Warden Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SNEAD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
BENNIE MAE SNEAD
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN DESHAWN JONES and DOE JOHN AND JANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MAYS v. STEEDLEY et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and CHAPLAIN ALEXANDER JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYS v. STEEDLEY
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddis et al v. Hamm et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
