Cases 91 - 100 of 143
Marks v. Woods et al (INMATE 2)(MEMBER)
as 2:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Julius Marks
Defendant:
P. Woods, D. Bell, Mr. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Keeton, et al (INMATE 2)(LEAD)
as 2:2013cv00620
Plaintiff:
Julius Marks
Defendant:
M. Keeton, L. Glenn, Lt. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Major v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2013cv01428
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Major
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Eric Smith, Herman Harris and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Thomas et al
as 2:2013cv01222
Plaintiff:
Karious N Bell
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Leon Forniss, Simone McNabb and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Wheat et al
as 4:2012cv03957
Plaintiff:
David Boy Fuller
Defendant:
Wheat, Webb, Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. United States of America
as 7:2012cv08018
Petitioner:
Jamie McKee Bell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Futch v. Rathman et al
as 1:2012cv00797
Petitioner:
John Randall Futch
Respondent:
John T Rathman and John Charles Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lawley v. Smith et al
as 2:2012cv00395
Petitioner:
Amanda Lawley
Respondent:
Shirley Smith, Henry Bell, Wanda Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perryman v. Bell et al
as 2:2011cv04024
Plaintiff:
Lysander Perryman
Defendant:
William Bell, Kathy Davis and Birmingham, City of
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
